Despite some complaints that the NBA has too many teams, it seems inevitable that the league will eventually expand in the long run. Why? Because there are just too many reasons to not at this point. In spite of everything, with recent NBA teams selling for as much as $4 billion, adding two latest franchises would allow the present owners to separate the revenue amongst themselves.
That gives the owners loads of incentive to vote for expansion when the time comes. The players would get theirs too, but not abruptly. As a substitute, they’d see it in the shape of basketball-related income, which is split 50/50 between the players and the NBA and helps determine the salary cap.
Way #1: More player movement in free agency.
The NBA generated around $8.9 billion last season, and that figure will certainly rise once the NBA agrees to a latest TV contract. Meaning the salary cap will proceed to extend rapidly. Due to this fact, by adding two latest teams, the basketball-related income can be divided evenly after which divided again amongst 32 teams, quite than simply 30.
This helps decelerate the salary cap increases. Just eight years ago, the cap stood at $70 million but will now be $124 million next season, so that may definitely help the owners. Nonetheless, it might help the players too, since it might mean there’d be more cash spread around.
More teams mean more options without cost agents, and that may result in a rise in player movement (which is already at an all-time high). That would also make it harder for good teams to retain their key free agents, possibly resulting in increased parity within the NBA.