5 C
New York

Angelina Jolie Details Abuse Allegations Against Brad Pitt in Countersuit

Published:

Angelina Jolie filed a cross grievance against her ex-husband Brad Pitt on Tuesday, disclosing recent details about what she described in court papers as abusive behavior by him on a personal plane in 2016 that led to the dissolution of their marriage.

In a court filing in Los Angeles, filed as a part of a legal battle over a winery the distinguished Hollywood actors once owned together, lawyers for Ms. Jolie stated that negotiations to sell her share of the business to Mr. Pitt had broken down over his demand that she sign “a nondisclosure agreement that may have contractually prohibited her from speaking outside of court about Pitt’s physical and emotional abuse of her and their children.”

Her filing goes on to explain an prolonged physical and verbal outburst in September 2016 as Mr. Pitt, Ms. Jolie and their six children flew from France to California. “Pitt choked one in all the youngsters and struck one other within the face” and “grabbed Jolie by the pinnacle and shook her,” the filing states, adding that at one point “he poured beer on Jolie; at one other, he poured beer and red wine on the youngsters.” Federal authorities, who’ve jurisdiction over flights, investigated the incident but declined to bring criminal charges. Days after the plane trip, Ms. Jolie filed for divorce.

A lawyer for Mr. Pitt, Anne Kiley, said that Mr. Pitt had accepted responsibility for some things in his past but that he wouldn’t accept responsibility for things he didn’t do.

The decoupling of Ms. Jolie and Mr. Pitt has stretched on for years, drawn out by a court battle for custody of their children and, more recently, a lawsuit instigated by Mr. Pitt over the French winery, Château Miraval, that the couple bought greater than a decade ago. Mr. Pitt’s lawsuit, filed this 12 months, accused his ex-wife of violating his “contractual rights” when she sold her half of the corporate to a subsidiary of Stoli Group without his approval.

Ms. Jolie’s cross grievance said she only sold her stake elsewhere after talks broke down over his demand for a nondisclosure agreement. Her filing states that the F.B.I. agent who investigated allegations that Mr. Pitt physically assaulted Ms. Jolie and their children on the plane in 2016 had “concluded that the federal government had probable cause to charge Pitt with a federal crime for his conduct that day.”

A redacted F.B.I. report on the case, which was reported on by several news outlets in August and later obtained by The Recent York Times, states that the agent provided the US Attorney’s Office “copies of a probable cause statement related to this incident.”

“After reviewing the document, representative of the US Attorney’s Office discussed the merits of this investigation with the case agent,” the report said. “It was agreed by all parties that criminal charges on this case wouldn’t be pursued attributable to several aspects.”

The F.B.I. report described Ms. Jolie as “conflicted on whether or to not be supportive of charges” related to the case.

Representatives from the F.B.I. and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles declined to comment.

“She has gone to great lengths to attempt to shield their children from reliving the pain Pitt inflicted on the family that day,” Ms. Jolie’s lawyers wrote within the cross grievance. “But when Pitt filed this lawsuit looking for to reassert control over Jolie’s financial life and compel her to rejoin her ex-husband as a frozen-out business partner, Pitt forced Jolie to publicly defend herself on these issues for the primary time.”

Based on Ms. Jolie’s account of the 2016 flight within the court papers, the dispute began when Mr. Pitt accused Ms. Jolie of being “too deferential” to their children after which began yelling at her in the toilet. “Pitt grabbed Jolie by the pinnacle and shook her, after which grabbed her shoulders and shook her again before pushing her into the toilet wall,” the filing states. “Pitt then punched the ceiling of the plane quite a few times, prompting Jolie to depart the toilet.”

When one in all the youngsters got here to Ms. Jolie’s defense, the court papers said, Mr. Pitt lunged at the kid, prompting her to grab him from behind. Amid the altercation, Mr. Pitt “choked one in all the youngsters and struck one other within the face,” the suit said.

The 2016 flight has been the topic of reports media reports since shortly after it occurred. In November of that 12 months, the F.B.I. released a press release saying that it had closed its investigation into the flight and that no charges had been filed.

Puck News reported this August that Ms. Jolie had been looking for information concerning the F.B.I.’s case as an anonymous plaintiff in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, with the publication including details of the report.

It’s unclear whether the heavily redacted F.B.I. report included allegations that Mr. Pitt had choked or struck any of the youngsters.

Ms. Jolie and Mr. Pitt met one another on the set of “Mr. & Mrs. Smith,” a 2005 motion movie wherein they played married assassins. In 2008, they purchased a controlling interest in Château Miraval, viewing it as each a family home and business; several years later, the couple was married on the property.

Ms. Jolie and Mr. Pitt have six children, now between the ages of 14 and 21.

The French winery, known for its rosé, is at the middle of a legal dispute between the divorced couple.

In February, Mr. Pitt sued Ms. Jolie and her former company, alleging that she violated his “contractual expectations” when she sold her interest within the wine company to Tenute del Mondo, a subsidiary of Stoli Group. Based on his lawsuit, the previous couple had an understanding that neither party would sell its share of the winery without the consent of the opposite.

“Jolie pursued after which consummated the purported sale in secret, purposely keeping Pitt at nighttime, and knowingly violating Pitt’s contractual rights,” his lawsuit alleged.

Last month, Ms. Jolie’s former company, which is now owned by Stoli Group, countersued Mr. Pitt, rebutting his version of events and his claim that the sale constituted a “hostile takeover.”

In Ms. Jolie’s own countersuit, filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on Tuesday, she said that she opted to sell her share of the wine business, partly, because she was growing uncomfortable with participating in an alcohol-related business, considering Mr. Pitt’s “acknowledged problem of alcohol abuse.” Mr. Pitt told The Times in 2019 that after Ms. Jolie filed for divorce, he frolicked in Alcoholics Anonymous and was committed to sobriety.

Her filing said there was no written or verbal understanding just like the one Mr. Pitt described, claiming that Mr. Pitt had, actually, rejected the concept there needed to be a plan in case the connection ended.

Of their lawsuits, Mr. Pitt and Ms. Jolie shared divergent accounts of how negotiations around him buying her portion of the wine company fell apart.

Mr. Pitt’s lawsuit asserted that Ms. Jolie pulled out of the tentative deal last 12 months after a judge overseeing the custody dispute issued a ruling against her, prompting her to show to Stoli Group.

Ms. Jolie’s countersuit claimed, nonetheless, that Mr. Pitt had been the one to tug out of the deal after she declined to comply with his nondisparagement clause, forcing her to show to a different buyer.

sportinbits@gmail.com
sportinbits@gmail.comhttps://sportinbits.com
Get the latest Sports Updates (Soccer, NBA, NFL, Hockey, Racing, etc.) and Breaking News From the United States, United Kingdom, and all around the world.

Related articles

spot_img

Recent articles

spot_img