BURTON-ON-TRENT, England — Gareth Southgate mentions the letter almost as an aside. It had arrived at his home, out within the Yorkshire countryside. He doesn’t go into detail about its contents beyond the proven fact that it was not exactly constructive feedback. It was best described, he said, as a “very strange letter about race.”
Just a few years ago, perhaps, the 52-year-old Southgate would have found it unsettling: not only the views it espoused but additionally the violation of his privacy, the threat implicit in an unsolicited piece of mail landing on his family’s doorstep. It is just not, though, the primary correspondence along those lines that he has received. Repeated exposure has thickened his skin.
More often than not, the letters come to his office at St. George’s Park, the sprawling complex just outside the town of Burton that serves because the headquarters of England’s various national teams. They’re, as a rule, entirely anonymous: no name, no return address. They are sometimes about his views on racial equality, or his support for his players taking the knee before games, but not exclusively. His stance on lockdowns also attracted a gentle volume of mail. His call for people to get their coronavirus vaccines prompted a torrent. Little of it was complimentary.
Southgate didn’t intend, when he was hurriedly installed as England’s manager in September 2016, to make his voice heard on any of those issues. Soft-spoken and cerebral, he hardly has the air of a polemicist.
Besides, the experiences of his predecessors taught him that there have been already some ways to fail because the England manager: not qualifying for tournaments; qualifying for but not winning tournaments; refusing to alter your captain; using an umbrella; drinking a pint of wine. The straightforward route, he knew, could be to “keep on with football.”
Credit…Niklas Halle’N/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
He eschewed it only because he felt he didn’t have a alternative.
“A few of these issues have found us,” he said. “We had players racially abused in Bulgaria. It was essential we took a stand. I’ve chosen to step into others.”
He knows, though, that his approach has come at a price. “Some fans won’t go along with you on results,” he said. “You might have some who won’t go along with you on quality of performance.” That is similar deal because the one all of his forerunners took; those are the terms and conditions of the job.
The difference, as Southgate put it, is that “now you’ve gotten a 3rd group”: the letter writers and the anonymous correspondents who object not a lot to the team he puts out or the way in which it plays but to who he’s and what he thinks.
The England manager is imagined to be a unifying national figure, someone for the country to rally around in pursuit of a shared ambition. The issue, as Southgate has found, is that England isn’t any longer a spot that is definitely unified on anything.
“I even have probably alienated certain fans,” he said. “I’m comfortable with that.”
The End of the Affair
The primary and biggest swell of England’s love affair with Southgate got here in that fervid summer of 2018, as he led a young and approachable national team to the cusp of a World Cup final. It was strange, and it was intense: He was pitched as the following prime minister, and he single-handedly revived the waistcoat.
The reprise, three years later, was only a touch more knowing: Southgate was serenaded with a reworked version of Atomic Kitten’s “Whole Again” as England made the ultimate of the European Championship on home soil. The Times of London ran a feature headlined: “The way to Be a Gareth: Why Decent Blokes Are Hot.”
Credit…Ryan Pierse/Getty Images
“There are only a few public figures who’re widely seen as unifying and trusted,” said Luke Tryl, the UK director on the research group More in Common. “It’s generally just people like David Attenborough.” On the eve of the European Championship last 12 months, Tryl said, polling put Southgate in the same bracket.
Not more than 18 months later, the contrast is stark. England might need qualified with ease for Qatar. It would go into the World Cup on the back of appearances within the semifinal and final of its last two major tournaments. It is likely to be regarded by Lionel Messi, no less, as considered one of the half dozen favorites to lift the trophy next month. But that feeling of unity is a distant memory.
Last month, England was relegated from its Nations League group, having did not win a single game. Southgate’s team was jeered by its own fans in a house defeat to Hungary and in a loss to Italy in Milan. Southgate has been accused of inhibiting his wealthy array of attacking talent — Harry Kane, Jack Grealish, Phil Foden, Bukayo Saka — through an excessive desire for caution, wasting a golden generation.
“I do know what the narrative is around how we set the team up,” Southgate said. “However the funny thing is I don’t remember any of this across the 2018 World Cup. Or after we played Germany, Ukraine and Denmark” — in Euro 2020 — “people weren’t saying it wasn’t good to observe.”
Southgate traces the roots of that disaffection to England’s first few games after lockdown, in September 2020, a pair of bleak, silent Nations League games against Iceland and Denmark.
“It was a bizarre period,” he said. “The games were behind closed doors. We were living in a bubble, being tested every second. It was a miserable experience. Certain players weren’t there. Others, we had to administer their minutes. They were almost preseason games, but all hell broke loose across the variety of play. I don’t think we’ve shaken that off.”
There may be, though, an alternate timeline. England’s final tuneup games for the European Championship the next summer were staged within the northern town of Middlesbrough. It was the primary time Southgate’s team had played in front of fans because the start of the pandemic, and because the protests that followed the killing in the US of a Black man, George Floyd, by the police.
Credit…Pool photo by Catherine Ivill
When his players took the knee before kickoff in the primary game, against Austria, an audible proportion of the gang booed. Southgate admitted, afterward, that he had been “disillusioned” on the response. However the players continued to kneel: Southgate confirmed Sunday in Doha that they’d kneel again on Monday before playing Iran.
“I believe we’ve got a situation where some people appear to think it’s a political stand that they don’t agree with,” he said. “That is just not the explanation we’re doing it.”
The perception that international management is a few form of part-time gig — just a few games a 12 months, loads of time to walk the dogs — grates on Southgate. “There isn’t a morning that I don’t get up considering immediately about what must be done,” he said.
His days are inclined to end with a late-night phone call along with his assistant, Steve Holland. “You might be consistently fascinated about how we play, who we pick,” he said. “It never stops, really.”
On that subject, Southgate knows he cannot win. Within the weeks and months before his team set off for the World Cup, he was chided for being too loyal to some players and insufficiently indulgent of others. Why was he still picking Harry Maguire? Why did he not construct his team around Trent Alexander-Arnold? What was the precise location of James Maddison?
“Selection will all the time divide fans, regardless of the sport,” he said. “People see their very own player in a certain light. We will’t take a look at whether the last couple of performances have been good or bad. We want to think over an extended time frame. What does our data tell us? What have we seen? How are they playing in larger games, against higher opponents, under real pressure? It’s a sifting process.”
His task, as he sees it, has been to stay regular in a world vulnerable to volatility. He has turn out to be increasingly careful, he said, concerning the media he consumes, limiting his exposure to the frenzied, protean debates over who must be on his team.
But Southgate must be just as cautious “with the front pages because the back.” In England, it is just not just with reference to who must be his first-choice right back that there’s, as he put it, “plenty of polar opinions, and never lots of room for nuance.”
Fielding questions unrelated to his team and his sport has, though, turn out to be a hazard of his job. In his first few interviews as England manager, he noticed that there have been “not many questions on football.” His tenure has been marked not only by Covid and the Black Lives Matter moment but by the enduring sore of the Qatar World Cup.
Credit…Ben Stansall/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
On each topic, he has done his best to choose his path fastidiously. He admitted that he has, for instance, found the problem of Qatar “overwhelming.”
“This can be a country being criticized internally for modernizing too fast,” he said. “We now have to be respectful of other cultures. It’s complicated. I can’t bounce up and down in public and expect people to get round a table.” Even so, on that and the entire other subjects he has confronted, he believes he has been “more lively” than he might need imagined. “I can’t be a loose cannon,” he said. “But I recognize my responsibility.”
That approach, he knows, can have made his job harder. Tryl’s research indicates that, unlike in the US, England doesn’t contain what are generally known as stacked identities: a person’s stance on Brexit is just not a reliable indicator, for instance, of their perception of lockdowns or vaccination, let alone issues like abortion or universal health care, where there’s broad social consensus.
“There may be lots of overlap and divergence,” Tryl said. The perception, though, is different. “Half the country think we’re more divided than we’ve ever been,” he said, and that perception itself has an influence.
Southgate, irrespective of how studiously he has tried to stifle slightly than spark controversy, has not been in a position to escape it. In a rustic that defines itself by division, even trying to search out nuance necessitates either taking, or being assigned, a side — and coping with the implications.
“I could have ducked all of it,” Southgate said. “But every time that is finished, I would like to have the ability to look back and say I stood for what I believed.”