9.9 C
New York

EPA issues clean water rule that repeals Trump administration changes

Published:

Saltwater wetland, Waquoit Bay Estuarine Research Reserve, Mass. 

Photo: Ariana Sutton-Grier, CC BY-ND

The Biden administration on Friday issued a rule that defines which varieties of waterways within the U.S. will receive federal water quality protections under the 1972 Clean Water Act, repealing a Trump-era rule that federal courts rejected and that environmental groups argued left waterways open to pollution.

The Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of the Army said the revised rule is based on definitions that were in place before 2015, when the Obama administration sought to expand federal protections.

Officials said the rule provides a more durable definition of the “waters of america” that receive federal protection and restores protections for a whole bunch of 1000’s of rivers, lakes, streams, wetlands and other bodies of water. Federally protected waters qualify for presidency programs focused on maintaining water quality and stopping oil spills, amongst other things.

Environmental groups have long argued that efforts to loosen federal water protections would significantly harm the country’s sources of secure drinking water. Farming groups, oil and gas producers and real estate developers have criticized such regulations as overbearing and burdensome to business, and lots of supported the 2020 Trump administration rule that attempted to dismantle protections.

Michael Regan, the EPA administrator, said in a press release the agency is “working to deliver a durable definition of WOTUS that safeguards our nation’s waters, strengthens economic opportunity, and protects people’s health while providing greater certainty for farmers, ranchers, and landowners.”

The EPA rule applies federal protections to wetlands, tributaries and other waters which have a solid connection to navigable waters or if wetlands are relatively everlasting. The rule also doesn’t impose a certain distance for when adjoining wetlands are protected, as officials said that various aspects can impact whether the wetland and the waterway can impact the water quality of one another.

The rule includes changes that make clear certain qualifications for waters which are excluded from regulation, akin to wetlands that were converted to cropland before 1985, waste treatment centers and artificially irrigated areas.

The agency said the rule’s definition of waterways will reduce uncertainty from changing regulatory definitions which have “harmed communities and our nation’s waters.”

“While the nation still has significant work to do to completely protect necessary waters, it’s encouraging to see the country taking a step in the proper direction to guard the waters we’d like for everybody’s health and the environment,” said Jon Devine, director of federal water policy for the Natural Resources Defense Council.

The rule comes ahead of a Supreme Court ruling set for next yr that might challenge the EPA’s ability to guard wetlands and other waters and upend Friday’s revisions. The case, called Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, challenges the federal government’s determination that a wetland on private land in Idaho is protected under the Clean Water Act.

sportinbits@gmail.com
sportinbits@gmail.comhttps://sportinbits.com
Get the latest Sports Updates (Soccer, NBA, NFL, Hockey, Racing, etc.) and Breaking News From the United States, United Kingdom, and all around the world.

Related articles

spot_img

Recent articles

spot_img