Electric vehicle batteries are briefly supply, and costs for materials reminiscent of nickel and cobalt are surging. Yet legacy automaker Ford Motor says it plans to be profitably constructing thousands and thousands of EVs a yr in only 4 years.
This week, the Detroit automaker gave investors a bit of more clarity about the way it plans to achieve that goal and transform its business built on gas-guzzling cars.
As electric vehicles account for a growing share of the worldwide automobile market, Ford in March announced it might reorganize its business and separate its internal-combustion engine and electric vehicle efforts. By 2026, it said it expects to construct greater than 2 million electric vehicles annually — a couple of third of its total global production — while expanding its operating profit margin.
Wall Street analysts were generally positive in regards to the plan, but some expressed skepticism in regards to the lack of specifics around how the corporate plans to beat the availability challenges out there. Morgan Stanley’s Adam Jonas called it a “stretch” goal and said he lacked confidence in Ford’s ability to secure enough raw materials and tooling to fabricate batteries to even come near its projection.
Ford addressed a few of those concerns in one other presentation on July 21, when it told investors that it has secured enough batteries to get to its near-term goal: 600,000 EVs per yr by the tip of 2023. As of now, it said, it has secured about 70% of what it must hit its 2026 goal.
Ford promised to share more about the way it plans to hit its goals during its annual capital markets day next yr. But during its second-quarter earnings call last week, CEO Jim Farley gave some more hints in regards to the automaker’s strategy.
A likelihood to simplify
As a substitute of just swapping out internal-combustion engines for batteries and electric motors, Farley has said the corporate is totally rethinking the way it develops its vehicles — and the way it keeps them fresh over time.
The corporate sees a recent era where it’ll have the option to freshen its electric vehicles with upgrades to software, batteries and electric motors, much as Tesla does. Meaning the costliest parts of a vehicle — the sheet metal body panels and the underpinnings that form its overall proportions — won’t should be modified as continuously.
Read more about electric vehicles from CNBC Pro
“We now have a possibility as we go digital with these EVs, to simplify our body engineering and put the engineering where customers really care,” Farley said last week. “And it is not a unique fender. It’s software. It is a digital display technology. It is a self-driving system and the [autonomous vehicle] tech. And in fact it may be, in some cases, more powerful motors.”
Ford typically redesigns its traditional vehicle models every five to seven years. If it could extend that point by counting on software updates to maintain its vehicles fresh, moderately than body redesigns, it could save fortunes.
It’s a part of how Ford expects to enhance its operating margin to 10% by 2026. For its second quarter, the corporate posted a 9.3% adjusted operating margin. Those results were helped by tight new-vehicle inventories which have allowed Ford to spice up its prices.
Ford is at an obstacle to corporations like Tesla and EV startups that sell on to consumers, without dealers acting as middlemen.
The corporate is not planning to eliminate its franchised dealers, which enjoy strong legal protections in lots of U.S. states that effectively forbid Ford from selling on to its customers as Tesla does. But Farley said that Ford sees a path to reducing that cost drawback — which he estimates at around $2,000 per vehicle — by keeping dealers’ inventories very low and by shifting the best way Ford markets its products.
One key to that effort: Ford plans to let customers order its EVs online moderately than buying a vehicle from a dealer’s inventory.
As Farley sees it, dealers may have only a number of recent vehicles on their lots, simply enough to supply test drives to customers before they order. Customers will have the option to order from the dealership or online “of their bunny slippers,” Farley said, with the dealer making the delivery and providing service after the sale.
Farley estimates that the low dealer inventories and online ordering will make up roughly $1,200 to $1,300 of that $2,000 per-vehicle cost drawback, while ensuring that Ford’s dealers remain profitable. The plan will free dealers from having to hold costly inventories, allowing them — in theory, no less than — to focus more on service and customer education. That would give Ford an edge that EV makers selling direct won’t have the option to simply match.
“I feel that is a unique play than the pure EV corporations,” Farley said.