22.4 C
New York

Guantánamo Prisoner Said He Was Waterboarded; Agents Omitted It From Memo

Published:

GUANTÁNAMO BAY, Cuba — A prisoner accused of plotting Al Qaeda’s bombing of the united statesS. Cole warship in 2000 told federal interrogators years later that he was waterboarded by the C.I.A., an interpreter testified this week. But that detail was omitted from the official account of the interrogations that prosecutors wish to use at his death-penalty trial as evidence that he confessed.

At issue within the hearings is whether or not the military judge will accept a 34-page memo written by agents who questioned the prisoner, Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, at Guantánamo Bay for 3 days in early 2007. The account of the interrogation is taken into account critical trial evidence. Defense lawyers say it’s tainted by torture and need it excluded.

“He talked in regards to the waterboarding,” John J. Elkaliouby, who worked for the F.B.I. as an Arabic linguist from 1994 to 2015, said in court on Thursday. “He said, ‘I used to be waterboarded by the C.I.A.,’ and I reported that to the entire team.”

Mr. Elkaliouby was called as a prosecution witness to explain the mood and atmosphere in the course of the interrogation, which he said was friendly, calm and “on the pleasure of Mr. Nashiri,” who was shackled on the ankles. The agents served tea and pastry, and the prisoner offered that he had been tortured.

The linguist solid the revelation as a surprise. “I didn’t expect that, to be honest.”

Testimony this week expanded on accounts which have emerged within the Sept. 11 case of how military prosecutors built death-penalty cases against men who were tortured during secret detention in overseas prisons run by the C.I.A., after which transferred to Guantánamo Bay in 2006 for trial by order of President George W. Bush.

The C.I.A. had a secret role at Guantánamo within the detention and interrogations of the boys by F.B.I. and Navy law enforcement agents, including collecting the notes from interrogations, Mr. Elkaliouby said. The C.I.A. required that the interrogators write their accounts of what they learned on agency computers, which were classified.

Before the interrogations began in early 2007, the federal agents were instructed to omit allegations of torture and abuse from what was colloquially called “clean team memos” — and as a substitute write a separate account.

Defense lawyers have said they received copies of those separate accounts amongst classified documents prosecutors turned over to them on this pretrial phase. However it is unimaginable to understand how the defendants raised the accusations because there are not any recordings or transcripts of those interrogations.

Seventeen U.S. sailors were killed within the suicide attack on the Cole during a refueling stop in Aden, Yemen, on Oct. 12, 2000. Although Mr. Nashiri was captured two years later and turned over to U.S. custody, he was not charged until 2011. The case has been mired in pretrial hearings for greater than a decade as defense lawyers have struggled to acquire and use details about his torture to disqualify evidence.

In addition they have argued that Mr. Nashiri, who’s now 57 and has been diagnosed by U.S. military doctors as suffering post-traumatic stress disorder, emerged from C.I.A. detention in a state of “learned helplessness,” essentially trained to inform his U.S. captors what he believed they desired to hear.

He was waterboarded in Thailand in 2002 by psychologists who worked as C.I.A. contractors and was subjected to rectal abuse and threatened with an influence drill and a gun during interrogations conducted by C.I.A. agents. For a time in late 2003 and early 2004, he was hidden at Guantánamo Bay in a C.I.A. black site near the prison facilities but out of reach of lawyers and the International Red Cross.

That site is often called Camp Echo 2, and it was where Mr. Nashiri was held in 2004 after which in 2007 for the interrogations that prosecutors consider central to their case.

Earlier Thursday, Bernard E. DeLury Jr., a retired Navy Reserve captain who’s now a superior court judge in Latest Jersey, testified for prosecutors that on March 14, 2007, Mr. Nashiri was “alert,” “present” and never under distress during a hearing to review his status as an enemy combatant.

Judge DeLury presided on the two-hour Combatant Status Review Tribunal, or C.S.R.T., during which, he said, he had “little question in my mind” that the prisoner’s participation was knowing and voluntary.

The method prohibited prisoners from having a lawyer, but Mr. Nashiri was assigned a Navy officer to act as a “personal representative,” speak on his behalf and help him reply to the allegations that the military said were sufficient to detain him as, essentially, a prisoner of the war against terrorism.

A defense lawyer, Capt. Brian L. Mizer of the Navy, asked Judge DeLury whether he knew that Mr. Nashiri had told his representative, who was called Lieutenant Commander X in court, that he was “afraid that he could be executed and dismembered at his C.S.R.T.”

Judge DeLury replied: “If he had told me that, I definitely would have explored that with him.”

sportinbits@gmail.com
sportinbits@gmail.comhttps://sportinbits.com
Get the latest Sports Updates (Soccer, NBA, NFL, Hockey, Racing, etc.) and Breaking News From the United States, United Kingdom, and all around the world.

Related articles

spot_img

Recent articles

spot_img