BOISE, Idaho (AP) — Idaho universities are warning staffers to not refer students to abortion providers, and not less than one public university is barring employees from telling students the way to obtain emergency contraception or contraception as well. It’s the most recent restriction in a state that already holds among the strictest abortion laws within the nation.
“That is going to have a really broad impact,” said Mike Satz, an attorney and former faculty member and interim dean on the University of Idaho’s College of Law. “It’s going to have a really strong chilling effect on free speech and it’s going to scare people. I’m afraid it’s going to scare people from going to highschool here or sending their kids to highschool at Idaho institutions.”
The prohibition against referring students to abortion providers or “promoting” abortion in any way comes from the “No Public Funds for Abortion Act,” a law passed by Idaho’s Republican-led Legislature in 2021. Boise State University, just like the University of Idaho, told faculty members in a newsletter earlier this month that they might face felony charges for violating the law. Idaho State University didn’t reply to phone messages from The Associated Press asking if it had issued similar guidance.
The law also bars staffers and school-based health clinics from shelling out or telling students where to acquire emergency contraception, similar to the Plan B pill, aside from in cases of rape. Emergency contraception drugs prevent pregnancy from occurring and don’t work in cases where someone is already pregnant.
The University of Idaho’s guidance released Friday goes a step further, also warning employees a couple of law written in 1867, 23 years before Idaho became a state. That law prohibits shelling out or “promoting” abortion services and contraception — resulting in UI’s advice that condoms be distributed only to stop sexually transmitted diseases, but not to stop pregnancy.
It’s not yet clear how the the law barring “promoting or promoting” abortion and contraception services could impact students or other state employees who may use state-owned computers or wireless networks to share details about the way to access reproductive health care on Instagram or other social media sites. Scott Graf, a spokesman for Idaho Attorney General Lawrence Wasden, said his office planned to debate the guidance given to school staffers and the abortion laws in an internal call Tuesday morning.
Jodi Walker, spokeswoman for the University of Idaho, said the university follows all laws and said UI officials were still “working through among the details.”
“It is a difficult law for a lot of and has real ramifications for people in that it calls for individual criminal prosecution,” she said of the general public funds law. “The section doesn’t specify what is supposed by promoting abortion, nonetheless, it is obvious that university employees are paid with public funds. Employees engaging of their course of labor in a way that favors abortion could possibly be deemed as promoting abortion.”
Abortion can still be discussed as a policy issue in classrooms, Walker said, however the university recommends that the workers in control of the category “remain neutral or risk violating this law.”
“We support our students and employees, in addition to academic freedom, but understand the necessity to work inside the laws set out by our state,” she said.
But that could possibly be nearly inconceivable, said Satz. Each the University of Idaho and Boise State University depend on grants to fund major research and academic projects, and the federal government is amongst the most important sources of those grants. The federal government also provides abortions through the Veteran’s Administration, Satz noted, and the “No Public Funds for Abortion Act” bars the state from contracting with abortion providers.
Idaho’s lawmakers could fine-tune the laws to make sure they don’t violate 1st Amendment free speech rights or result in major funding losses, however the deeply conservative state Legislature isn’t scheduled to satisfy again until January.
Boise State’s advisory to employees noted that abortion-producing medications or procedures can still be prescribed in the event that they are used to remove a dead fetus brought on by spontaneous abortion, to treat an ectopic pregnancy or to “save the life or preserve the health of the unborn child.” But a few of those scenarios are gray areas under other state laws criminalizing abortions, including one targeted in a U.S. Department of Justice federal lawsuit against the state of Idaho.
Idaho isn’t the one state where employees have been cautioned not to offer abortion advice. In the summertime, librarians in Oklahoma City were warned against using the word “abortion,” though that modified after town’s library team reviewed the laws. Still, social staff, clergy members and others have raised concerns in Oklahoma about being exposed to criminal or civil liability only for discussing abortions.