It’s at all times dangerous to take whistleblower complaints at face value — many individuals who make claims of covert corporate malfeasance and government wrongdoing accomplish that out of revenge (being fired) or to make cash on the controversy their charges whip up.
They often have every incentive to exaggerate and, sometimes, outright lie. As a reporter covering these folks, I’ve seen the dark side of the whistleblower business far an excessive amount of.
And yet, law enforcement could be dumb to disregard them, because in addition they are sometimes right. A few of these persons are downright strange, but as you meander through their various conspiracy theories and personality quirks, you realize that they’re onto something.
Before Jeffrey Wigand exposed the evils of Big Tobacco, CBS initially tried to kill the story, fearing lawsuits. Wigand, too, was a little bit of an odd duck, but truth is at all times a defense in libel cases and Wigand’s allegations were bullet-proof — and his led to reforms.
Investor Harry Markopolos got here across as a gadfly, so he was ignored by the Securities and Exchange Commission when he went to them with the products on Bernie Madoff long before Bernie destroyed livelihoods and lives.
Peiter Zatko had been hired by Twitter in 2020 to enhance the defenses from the social media platform. Matt McClain/The Washington Post via Getty Images
That’s why the feds must take very seriously what’s now being alleged by Peiter Zatko about former employer Twitter, perhaps the world’s hottest social media company. If what he’s saying is true, what we may need here’s a scandal approaching the Enron fiasco 20 years ago.
In Zatko, we also may need one among those disgruntled former employees, which is basically what Twitter is asking the previous hacker who goes by the name “Mudge” (again, whistleblowers are an unconventional breed). Twitter hired Zatko in 2020 to enhance the social media platform’s defenses after a series of great hacks exposed holes in its infrastructure that left its user data open to bad actors and eventually a regulatory settlement where it promised to wash up its act.
Zatko seemed perfect for the job. As an “ethical hacker,” he testified before Congress concerning the Web’s inherent weaknesses. It could easily be compromised by people like him, essentially shutting down the economy and loads more, he said. He worked for a security project affiliated with the Defense Department before going to Twitter, where he was fired for “poor performance and leadership” a bit greater than a 12 months after he was hired, in accordance with a press release the company gave to The Washington Post.
Elon Musk has attempted to back out of his deal to purchase Twitter. Getty Images
Twitter has not responded to quite a few requests by me for comment, and has issued only a number of obtuse statements on the matter, so it’s not possible for me to know exactly what those performance and leadership issues are. Zatko’s attorney didn’t reply to a phone call or email searching for comment.
But details of Zatko’s whistleblower grievance — copies of which have been submitted to Congress, the Justice Department, the Securities and Exchange Commission, etc., — have been making the rounds amongst top white-collar-crime attorneys.
The overwhelming consensus among the many experts is that if any of what Zatko says is true, it’s a major threat to the long run of the corporate that serves as a world town square for politicians, revolutionaries and, yes, tens of millions of trolls and bots using the platform for nefarious reasons.
Again these are big “ifs” but, like Markopolos, Zatko did provide 200 pages of detail about how Twitter did not live as much as a 2010 FTC settlement that forced the corporate to higher secure customer data. Again, if that’s true, the federal government will seek a pound of flesh from Twitter for ignoring settlement terms.
One other charge by Zatko: Twitter undercounts the numbers of those fake accounts or bots on its platform to spice up ad rates.
Musk alleges that Twitter didn’t disclose information concerning the amount of bots on the platform. AFP via Getty Images
That is what Tesla founder Elon Musk is alleging in his try to renege on his initial $44 billion bid for the social media platform. Twitter sued Musk to implement the lucrative deal terms, but here’s why Twitter’s problems transcend Musk walking and negating an enormous payday, white-collar lawyers say.
Twitter has long held that bots make up lower than 5% of its “monetizable energetic every day users.” Again, Musk says that is hogwash, though he offers no evidence. But his claims are actually bolstered by Zatko’s voluminous filing to the regulators, which states that his former boss, current Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal, did not heed his warning concerning the issue with the intention to boost ad sales.
Again, a number of “ifs” here, and the small print outlining exactly what evidence Zatko uses to make such a daring assertion haven’t been disclosed. But when there’s good evidence the corporate is downplaying the variety of bots, it could mean years of Twitter disclosures to investors and advertisers are false; aka securities fraud.
Chester Spatt, a former director of the SEC’s Office of Economic Evaluation, lays out the potential impact on Twitter in an interview with Eleanor Terrett of Fox Business: “If claims are true, the SEC will open an investigation and will seek a bar to stop executives from holding executive positions in the long run.”
Perhaps even worse, amid the legal fallout from class-action lawsuits, management upheaval, fines, penalties, etc., the “company will almost actually be valued not less than half of” the $44 billion Musk offered, Spatt said. It will not be the accounting fraud on the extent of Enron that shook the markets and cratered what was then one among the largest energy corporations on the earth, but Spatt and others say it could possibly be close.
That’s why it’s good to take whistleblowers seriously.