10.8 C
New York

Judge orders Trump to present details about Mar-a-Lago warrant lawsuit

Published:

An aerial view of former U.S. President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home after Trump said that FBI agents raided it, in Palm Beach, Florida, U.S. August 15, 2022.

Marco Bello | Reuters

A federal judge appointed by former President Donald Trump ordered him Tuesday to reply several key questions on his recent lawsuit related to the FBI raid on his Florida home, including why her court must be the one hearing the case and to more precisely explain what he wants her to do.

Judge Aileen Cannon also ordered Trump to inform her how his suit affects one other pending case involving the identical search warrant before a federal magistrate judge in the identical court, and whether the Department of Justice has been served along with his lawsuit yet.

Cannon also desires to know if Trump is searching for any injunctions related to material seized within the raid until the lawsuit is resolved.

Cannon’s order got here a day after Trump filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, asking her to appoint a so-called special master to review documents seized Aug. 8 within the FBI raid on his Mar-a-Lago resort residence in Palm Beach.

The judge, whom Trump appointed to that court in 2020, gave him and his lawyers until Friday to reply her questions.

Trump desires to block the DOJ from examining the seized documents until a special master looks at them. The step is usually taken when there’s a likelihood that some evidence must be withheld from prosecutors because of assorted legal privileges.

The DOJ is conducting a criminal investigation related to the documents being faraway from the White House when Trump left office in January 2021. By law, presidential records are required to be turned over to the National Archives.

A warrant authorizing the FBI’s search-and-seizure operation at Mar-a-Lago shows that the DOJ is probing potential violations of laws related to espionage and obstruction of justice. Multiple sets of documents marked top secret were seized within the raid.

Trump claims the raid was illegal and motivated by a desire to harm his probabilities of regaining the White House if he decides to run again.

CNBC Politics

Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

Cannon in her order Tuesday wrote: “The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s Motion for Judicial Oversight and Additional Relief.”

“To facilitate appropriate resolution, on or before August 26, 2022, Plaintiff shall file a complement to the Motion further elaborating on the next: (1) the asserted basis for the exercise of this Court’s jurisdiction, whether legal, equitable/anomalous, or each; (2) the framework applicable to the exercise of such jurisdiction;” Cannon wrote.

The judge also told Trump’s team to detail “the precise relief sought, including any request for injunctive relief pending resolution of the Motion; (4) the effect, if any, of the proceeding before Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart; and (5) the status of Plaintiff’s efforts to perfect service on Defendant.”

Reinhart signed the warrant authorizing the raid. He’s considering requests by media outlets to unseal an affidavit that the DOJ filed, which laid out the necessity for the search and events leading as much as it.

Earlier Tuesday, the National Archives posted online a letter that said classified material was present in boxes that Trump turned over to that agency in January.

The fabric, which spans 700 pages, includes ones related to top secret, sensitive compartmented information and special access programs, the National Archives letter said.

sportinbits@gmail.com
sportinbits@gmail.comhttps://sportinbits.com
Get the latest Sports Updates (Soccer, NBA, NFL, Hockey, Racing, etc.) and Breaking News From the United States, United Kingdom, and all around the world.

Related articles

spot_img

Recent articles

spot_img