4.7 C
New York

Judge Tosses Trump Suit Against Hillary Clinton That is ‘Lacking In Substance’

Published:

A federal judge has tossed a lawsuit Donald Trump filed against Hillary Clinton in March, accusing Clinton and other high-profile Democrats of orchestrating a “malicious conspiracy” by linking his 2016 presidential campaign to Russian meddling within the election.

In a Thursday ruling, U.S. District Judge Donald Middlebrooks ripped the suit as a legally deficient “two-hundred-page political manifesto” that Trump’s lawyers couldn’t even present “in a concise and cohesive manner.”

Middlebrooks wrote: “What the [lawsuit] lacks in substance and legal support it seeks to substitute with length, hyperbole, and the settling of scores and grievances.”

He added that the “court just isn’t the suitable forum” for Trump’s grievance, which was rife with “glaring problems” and claims “not warranted under existing law.”

What’s more, Middlebrooks found that a lot of Trump’s claims were unsubstantiated at best.

“Most of the amended grievance’s characterizations of events are implausible,” he wrote, “because they lack any specific allegations which could provide factual support for the conclusions reached.”

Trump sought upwards of $21 million in damages, at one point asking for greater than $72 million.

Despite repeated denials of what he calls the “Russia hoax,” multiple investigations found that Russia meddled within the 2016 presidential election to harm Clinton and aid Trump.

At one point, Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort even shared internal Trump campaign polling data with Konstantin Kilimnik, a Russian intelligence officer.

Manafort was sentenced to seven and a half years in prison in 2019 after pleading guilty to conspiracy against the U.S. and one other of conspiracy to obstruct justice. Trump pardoned him after he lost the 2020 election.

Most of the accusations in Trump’s 108-page lawsuit had already been debunked in a 2020 bipartisan report from the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee.

Trump attorney Alina Habba told CNN they planned to appeal the ruling.

“We vehemently disagree with the opinion issued by the court today,” Habba said in a press release. “Not only is it rife with erroneous applications of the law, it disregards the various independent governmental investigations which substantiate our claim that the defendants conspired to falsely implicate our client and undermine the 2016 presidential election.”

sportinbits@gmail.com
sportinbits@gmail.comhttps://sportinbits.com
Get the latest Sports Updates (Soccer, NBA, NFL, Hockey, Racing, etc.) and Breaking News From the United States, United Kingdom, and all around the world.

Related articles

spot_img

Recent articles

spot_img