DOHA, Qatar — Brazil’s players already appear to have identified their preferred candidate. They’d known, long before their quarterfinal defeat to Croatia sent them out of the World Cup, that Tite — the affable, cerebral coach of the national team for the past six years — can be stepping down. Now, they’d decided that probably the most exacting job in international soccer should go to Fernando Diniz.
The 48-year-old Diniz definitely had a robust case. The squad’s elder statesmen, Daniel Alves and Thiago Silva, offered glowing references. So did a few the team’s younger members, Antony and Bruno Guimaraes, who had worked with him early of their careers. Most vital, he had Neymar on board: As way back as July, Brazil’s most influential star had tweeted about his admiration for Diniz.
Not everyone seems to be quite so convinced. Ronaldo, the World Cup-winning striker who has functioned, essentially, as a ghost on the feast during this tournament, suggested he didn’t “see many options” for Tite’s successor amongst Brazilian coaches. Diniz, he said, was the perfect of them, but he was way more enthused by the concept of something unprecedented: appointing a foreigner to teach the Brazilian national team.
The Italian Carlo Ancelotti, the Spaniard Pep Guardiola, the Portuguese Abel Ferreira were all, Ronaldo said, more appealing. “I get a very good feeling from these names,” he said.
Brazil just isn’t the one country to have left Qatar reasonably sooner than expected that finds itself wrestling with this issue. 1 / 4 of the teams within the tournament had barely picked up their baggage from the carousel before they parted company with their managers. A pair, the Netherlands and Spain, have hurried to appoint replacements. Six more are starting their seek for candidates. A handful of others, including England and Portugal, may yet join them.
That task, though, just isn’t quite as easy because it sounds. Managing a national team just isn’t — and has not been for a while — the head of a coach’s profession. A lot of the game’s most feted managers, obsessives who thrive on fine-tuning their complex, intricate systems on a day by day basis, find the disjointed nature of international soccer unattractive.
A Transient Guide to the 2022 World Cup
Card 1 of 9
What’s the World Cup? The quadrennial event pits the perfect national soccer teams against one another for the title of world champion. Here’s a primer to the 2022 men’s tournament:
Where is it being held? This 12 months’s host is Qatar, which in 2010 beat the USA and Japan to win the correct to carry the tournament. Whether that was an honest competition stays in dispute.
When is it? The tournament opened on Nov. 20, when Qatar played Ecuador. Over the 2 weeks that follow, 4 games can be played on most days. The tournament ends with the ultimate on Dec. 18.
Is a winter World Cup normal? No. The World Cup often takes place in July. But in 2015, FIFA concluded that the summer temperatures in Qatar might need unpleasant consequences and agreed to maneuver the tournament to the relatively bearable months of November and December.
What number of teams are competing? Thirty-two. Qatar qualified routinely because the host, and after years of matches, the opposite 31 teams earned the correct to come back and play. Meet the teams here.
How does the tournament work? The 32 teams are divided into eight groups of 4. Within the opening stage, each team plays all the opposite teams in its group once. The highest two finishers in each group advance to the round of 16. After that, the World Cup is a straight knockout tournament.
How can I watch the World Cup within the U.S.? The tournament can be broadcast on Fox and FS1 in English, and on Telemundo in Spanish. You possibly can livestream it on Peacock, or on streaming services that carry Fox and FS1. Here’s how one can watch every match.
When will the games happen? Qatar is three hours ahead of London, eight hours ahead of Recent York and 11 hours ahead of Los Angeles. Meaning there can be predawn kickoffs on the East Coast of the USA for some games, and midafternoon starts for 10 p.m. games in Qatar.
Got more questions? We’ve got more answers here.
Neither is it necessarily clear that a wealthy, impressive résumé in club soccer is a reliable guide to success with a rustic. Only three coaches in Qatar had, for instance, won the Champions League: Germany’s Hansi Flick, Spain’s Luis Enrique and Louis van Gaal, the Dutch coach. Only van Gaal can be satisfied together with his tournament. Flick’s team left after the group stage, Enrique’s within the round of 16.
Those managers who’ve thrived, however, have way more low-key backgrounds. France’s Didier Deschamps contested a Champions League final in 2004 and won a French title with Marseille in 2010. Walid Regragui, the Morocco coach, has built a positive profession in his homeland, leading Wydad Casablanca to the African Champions League this spring.
But Argentina’s Lionel Scaloni has no club experience — he was awarded the national team post after impressing with the country’s under-20 team — while Zlatko Dalic, the Croatian manager, was working in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates for nearly a decade before he was appointed by his nation in 2017. Neither might have been described as a glamorous hire.
After which, after all, there may be the problem of nationality. Plenty of nations, ordinarily in what is perhaps called soccer’s developing world, have long imported coaches. In the game’s major nations, though, it stays a big, and never uncontroversial, step.
“The national team is ours,” as Rivaldo, one other Brazilian great, said this week. “It must be coached by someone with Brazilian blood running through their veins.”
There’s nothing in the foundations that requires a rustic’s national team be managed by someone born, raised or otherwise connected to that place, after all. And a literal interpretation of Rivaldo’s hard-line stance is most definitely impractical in a world of layered, fluid identities.
It is tough to not feel, though, that it comes close — within the case of soccer’s powerhouses — to negating the concept, the aim, of international soccer. These tournaments, in any case, are essentially a test of the strength of a rustic’s soccer culture: the ideas it has (or has borrowed and adapted), the players it may possibly produce.
In Brazil’s case, that culture has a serious shortcoming on the subject of managers. The explanation Ronaldo, for one, just isn’t wholly convinced by Diniz’s suitability is, most definitely, because Diniz has coached greater than a dozen clubs during his managerial profession. He has been working as a manager since 2009. In several of his most up-to-date jobs, he was fired after barely a number of months in charge.
As Neymar said in his tweet lobbying for Diniz, the shortage of time shown and patience afforded to coaches is a deep-rooted problem in Brazil’s soccer culture. A lot of the other domestic candidates have the identical issue; clubs are so trigger-happy, so demanding, that managers are never given the possibility to construct anything.
If a national team is anything, it’s a mirrored image of each element of that culture: the great and the bad, the strengths and the weaknesses. Brazil can, after all, take a shortcut, and appoint a foreigner to make up for its inability to nurture coaching talent. But that’s what it’s: a shortcut. It doesn’t address the problem at its root. It’s a way of avoiding the labor. It is perhaps positive by the letter of the law. Whether it’s within the spirit of it’s a unique matter.