Someday after Twitter’s recent CEO Elon Musk and journalist Matt Taibbi released a bombshell report on political censorship at Twitter, Musk said that there are “more smoking guns” he plans to disclose in the long run.
He said he hopes that by showing how Twitter worked to suppress information — prefer it did with The Post’s expose on Hunter Biden’s laptop in 2020 — it is going to force mainstream media to be more committed to the reality.
“We’re just gonna put all the data on the market attempt to get a clean slate we can be iteratively higher and it is going to force other media firms to even be more truthful or else they’ll lose their readership,” Musk said in a live Twitter Space Query and Answer session, which tens of hundreds of users tuned into.
On Friday, Taibbi published a shocking collection of internal communications revealing that Democrat insiders communicated with Twitter to suppress The Post’s coverage of Hunter Biden’s laptop ahead of the 2020 presidential election.
Musk said Saturday that he believes there are “more smoking guns” at Twitter he desires to share with the general public — but said it’s not clear when the data can be released.
“We’re just gonna put all the data on the market attempt to get a clean slate,” Elon Musk noted.Twitter/@elonmusk
Nevertheless, he noted that he has “not been poring over the Twitter files personally,” he said, as an alternative leaving that to Taibbi and journalist Bari Weiss.
Despite not reviewing the documents themselves, Musk said it appears there have been “a really different standard applied to Republican candidates within the US versus a Democrat candidates,” on Twitter.
“I’m not saying this is unquestionably the case. There appears to have been a double standard where Democrats weren’t censored … and Republicans were and it was and I feel that is frankly obvious to anyone who uses Twitter.
“It’s frankly the the behavior that’s to be expected from a company that’s that relies in San Francisco which is much left,” he said, noting that political contributions from Twitter were over 99% Democrat.
Matt Taibbi revealed that Democrat insiders communicated with Twitter to suppress The Post’s coverage of Hunter Biden’s laptop.
Matt Taibbi showed documents released to him by Elon Musk.
Part 1 of the Twitter files that Matt Taibbi aired on twitter.
“Well, what type of viewpoint would you expect people to have then? It’s the behavior you’ll expect from an organization that is actually a distillation of San Francisco politics.”
Twitter’s former chief censor Vijaya Gadde will come under Judiciary Committee scrutiny when Republicans take control of the House in January — as fallout from the primary installment of Musk’s findings of political favoritism and censorship at Twitter continues to mount.
Compensate for Twitter’s censorship of the Post’s Hunter Biden laptop story
“We’re tracking Vijaya Gadde’s role within the suppression of the Recent York Post story on Hunter Biden’s laptop,” a committee spokesperson told The Post on Saturday. “We absolutely plan to research this more. Stay tuned.”
Gadde, 48, Twitter’s former head of legal, policy, and trust, played a “key role” in suppressing The Post’s Hunter Biden coverage, Taibbi wrote after his review of the social media company’s internal communications for a report he called “The Twitter Files.”
Vijaya Gadde reportedly played a “key role” in suppressing The Post’s Hunter Biden coverage.Bloomberg via Getty Images
The ex-exec, who also played an instrumental role in the corporate’s decision to ban former President Trump from the platform, was fired by Musk in October shortly after he purchased the corporate for $44 billion.
Gadde — who landed an influential administration post in an advisory committee to the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency while still a Twitter worker — reportedly earned $17 million in 2021.
Musk reveled within the traffic that Taibbi’s Friday document drop was generating for his newly acquired site.
“Twitter servers are running at Warp 9!!” he exulted early Saturday.
Musk has insisted full disclosure is required on Twitter’s controversial alternative to dam The Post’s bombshell report about Hunter Biden ahead of the 2020 election.
Taibbi’s report revealed that a small group of top-level execs selected to label The Post’s story concerning the son of then-candidate Joe Biden as “hacked material” with none evidence — and repeatedly bowed to Democrats’ demands to excise all discussion of the explosive report from the location.
In accordance with Taibbi, the social media company “took extraordinary steps to suppress” the laptop story, removing links to the expose shared by users and posting warnings that it might be “unsafe.”
In other news:
- Mainstream journalists — in lockstep with Democratic strategists — smeared Taibbi as a “sad” “fraud” for working with Musk to substantiate the inner documents. “Selling your soul for the richest white nationalist on Earth,” Every day Beast columnist Wajahat Ali posted. “Matt Taibbi at all times was, and still stays, a fraud,” wrote Dem pollster Matt McDermott.
- Each the Recent York Times and the Washington Post refused to this point to cover the Twitter firestorm, earning Musk’s ire. “The Recent York Times has grow to be, for all intents and purposes, an unregistered lobbying firm for far-left politicians,” Musk wrote on Twitter after radio host Clay Travis identified the glaring absence from the 2 newspapers’ web sites.
- Furious Republicans blasted Twitter’s partisan censors. “Leftists hate your freedom,” tweeted Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, who compared their suppression to that of the Chinese Communist Party. “They wish to silence all dissent.” Meanwhile, tech investor and GOP donor Peter Thiel cheered the report. “Sunlight is one of the best disinfectant!” Thiel told The Post.
- Actor James Woods, who Taibbi found was targeted for Twitter censorship on the behest of the Democratic National Committee, threatened to guide a category motion lawsuit against the social media giant and the DNC. “How would you wish to fund a category motion suit for many who were suppressed?” Woods asked Musk in a tweet that thanked the billionaire for making the documents public. “I’ll be completely satisfied to be lead plaintiff.”
- Twitter can have interfered in one other national election as well, Musk said: the Oct. 30 contest in Brazil, where left wing stalwart Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva ousted far right President Jair Bolsonaro.. “It’s possible that Twitter personnel gave preference to left wing candidates,” Musk tweeted early Saturday in response to a user who asked him to search out out whether the platform had meddled in some other nation’s politics.
- French President Emmanuel Macron met with Musk during his tour of Recent Orleans late Friday, pressing him to bolster Twitter’s content moderation. “We’ll work with Twitter to enhance the protection of youngsters online,” Macron posted. “Elon Musk confirmed it to me today. Let’s higher protect our kids online.”
Musk, 51, the world’s richest man, purchased Twitter last month so as to transform it right into a haven without cost speech.
Musk has insisted full disclosure is required on the corporate’s controversial alternative to dam The Post’s bombshell report about President Biden’s son ahead of the 2020 election — and has been teasing the discharge of the inner files for days.
After Musk’s blockbuster takeover of Twitter, its top advertisers fled the location, devastating the corporate’s revenue. On Saturday, Musk confirmed that Apple — the platform’s historically and presently biggest advertiser — had returned, amongst others.
“I feel we’re beginning to see plenty of other advertisers also resume their spending,” Musk said within the Twitter Space Q&A. “I feel that the issue is that they might read all these stories within the media after which think that they were true they usually’re not true.”
Musk said advertisers are returning as “it’s becoming clear that the media stories about Twitter being some kind of, like, right wing hellscape, which it absolutely isn’t,” are unfounded, adding that he’s “cautiously optimistic concerning the future” of the corporate.