Earlier within the yr, my wife and I drove into a carpark, paid for 2 hours of parking, displayed the ticket within the windscreen, left inside one hour – and still a charge got here through the post for £60 for non-payment after the automobile was spotted on an ANPR camera.
I appealed once, luckily I had paid by debit card and had a payment reference for the parking which I sent across. That was rejected. It apparently was not enough proof – did I still have the ticket?
The reply was: ‘No. I’m not within the habit of keeping each parking ticket I pay for.’ I appealed again and asked for the private parking firm to trace the payment. Surely it could find it if it desired to?
Nope. Rejected again – and I could either pay, face it escalating to £100 after 14 days, or use independent appeals process POPLA.
Parking pain: We recently had a charge within the post from a non-public company, despite paying and adhering to the terms of the automobile park
I did just that inside minutes of receiving the second rejection out of pure bewilderment. A horrible feeling of being found guilty, despite knowing we were innocent.
A few weeks passed after which I had an email from POPLA. The private firm in query had magically decided to cancel the charge.
But how many individuals would have been panicked into paying such an unjust charge or easy would not trouble to fight it, despite being in the suitable?
It’s an incredibly frustrating part of contemporary British life – the plague of personal parking firms.
We were in a town we might never visited before, so picked the best central automobile park we could find and went through the rigmarole of entering the automobile registration plate and paying greater than I normally would to park.
Had I entered the reg plate incorrectly? Well I comprehend it in the identical way I do know my phone number and PIN, and typically double check – however the private firm didn’t say I had, nor did it seem to envision.
In reality, it didn’t explain how this unjust charge had come to fruition, in any way.
I mean, what is the point of issuing me a ticket to place within the windscreen of the automobile if an ANPR camera is getting used?
It’s now the third time we have had a penalty charge come through the post within the last 4 years, addressed to my wife as she is the registered keeper of the vehicle – the DVLA selling her details for £2.50 a pop.
I won’t let you know who was driving because it is an important a part of the appeal, not revealing who was on the wheel.
All three have been cancelled after appealing, the primary went through POPLA – I argued that the charge had been sent within the post well beyond the deadline that is ready out in guidelines; the second in a supermarket automobile park was cancelled almost immediately; and now this one which after a battle also got canned.
They’ve all been different corporations.
What would have happened if I had paid by money, which I do fairly often? I might don’t have any way of proving the payment unless I had kept the ticket.
I’m now within the daft scenario by which I keep an envelope in my automobile and put parking tickets I’ve paid for as I’ve gone along. I do not trust these private firms.
A number of years ago, That is Money began a campaign to attempt to stamp this behaviour out. It’s fair to charge for parking, it’s fair to put out terms and conditions, but these charges are being sent out – for my part – in a scattergun fashion and sometimes without merit.
Where is the common sense approach?
There have been meant to be changes afoot and we were comfortable that the campaign can have helped in a small approach to help improve the situation for drivers.
Nonetheless, that plan looks to be in jeopardy with ministers recently temporarily withdrawing the Private Parking Code of Practice.
In case you do find yourself with a parking charge within the post, appeal it. Never tell the corporate who was driving, put your case together in addition to you possibly can, and whether it is rejected, persevere.
Parking corporations’ tactics appear to be to show down your first appeal, nevertheless reasonable or right you might be. So don’t falter at the primary hurdle.
This most up-to-date parking charge episode has incensed me a lot. Why have we allowed an easy thing like using a carpark change into so complicated?
To date it has been Lee 3 – 0 Parking Firms. I actually hope I do not have to attain a fourth any time soon.
Parking apps could be a pain too…
While we’re as regards to automobile parks, I used to be in a single recently, in a seaside village in East Anglia, which had made us use one in every of those often frustrating automobile park payment apps. No alternative to make use of a machine to pay by card or money.
The mobile signal was patchy, and two separate older people asked me where to pay for parking. I felt bad once I said it could only be done by phone. They drove out of the automobile park.
These automobile parking apps usually are not built the identical either. For instance, the one I take advantage of in my local town doesn’t require me to have an account, or tick a load of boxes opting out of sharing my details with third parties and is simple to make use of.
On this particular automobile park with a special company, I needed to create an account with a password, tick a load of boxes before I could undergo to pay the measly £2.
I entered my debit card details, after which it required a two-factor request from my bank. Finally, in any case of that, it went through. It’s tedious in comparison with sticking a £2 coin in a machine or tapping a debit card.
Did those two cars that did not park in there drive away without spending their money in that village? Possibly.
Modern life and technology could be great, however it should not be to the detriment of those that usually are not as tech savvy, may not own a smartphone and wish an easy approach to pay to park.
Some links in this text could also be affiliate links. In case you click on them we may earn a small commission. That helps us fund This Is Money, and keep it free to make use of. We don’t write articles to advertise products. We don’t allow any business relationship to affect our editorial independence.