Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis meticulously curated the memory of her husband after he was assassinated, reimagining President John F. Kennedy as a fallen King Arthur in a modern-day Camelot.
Now some historians wonder if Laurene Powell Jobs can also be attempting to frame the legacy of her late husband, Steve Jobs, an advanced and transformational figure who was shadowed by his flaws as a father and belligerence as a boss.
Last month, Ms. Powell Jobs introduced the Steve Jobs Archive. It aspires to reinvent the private archive much as Mr. Jobs, in his years running Apple, remade music with the iPod and communication with the iPhone.
Fairly than offering up a repository of private correspondence, notes and items for public research and inquiry, as other influential figures have done, Ms. Powell Jobs, who didn’t reply to requests for comments, said at a conference last month that the Steve Jobs Archive could be dedicated to “ideas.” Those ideas are primarily Mr. Jobs’s philosophies about life and work.
The result, for now, is more of a tribute website than an archive. Greater than a dozen archivists and students who spoke to The Recent York Times questioned even calling it an archive. It has apprehensive historians who fear it could encourage other wealthy and influential figures to curate the historical record about them just as bizarre people curate their lives on Instagram.
“One in every of the things that excites me about archives is the warts and all,” said Courtney Chartier, an archivist at Columbia University who has worked on Martin Luther King Jr.’s archive and the papers of Tony Kushner, the playwright. “Persons are complicated, and that’s something we shouldn’t shrink back from.”
The Steve Jobs Archive deviates from the repositories of other famous business leaders who largely left their material to corporate or library archives. About half of Harvard Business School’s 25 best business leaders of the twentieth century left behind personal archives which are open to the general public in libraries or museums, including Henry Ford, Thomas Edison and Asa Candler, who built Coca-Cola.
Other iconic business founders comparable to Walt Disney, Sam Walton and Ray Kroc entrusted their papers to the businesses they built, allowing those collections to develop into the cornerstone of corporate archives.
Much of that corporate archive material is closed to the general public, but some corporations, comparable to the Walt Disney Company, make personal correspondence, notes, speeches and other items available to authors for research.
More on Big Tech
- Inside Meta’s Struggles: After a rocky 12 months, employees at Meta are expressing skepticism, confusion and frustration over Mark Zuckerberg’s vision for the metaverse.
- A Deal for Twitter?: In a surprise move, Elon Musk has offered to accumulate Twitter at his original price of $44 billion, which could bring to an end the acrimonious legal fight between the billionaire and the corporate.
- Slowing Business: Snap, the maker of the messaging app Snapchat, has been battling a pointy slowdown in its promoting business. Even so, it has continued so as to add latest users.
- Texas Sues Google: Ken Paxton, the state’s attorney general, filed a lawsuit against the tech giant, saying products like Google Photos violated Texans’ privacy rights.
“We don’t censor,” said Becky Cline, director of the Walt Disney archives. “We just vet.”
The brand new Jobs archive debuted with a minimalist website containing eight pieces of video, audio and writing that express what the archive calls Mr. Jobs’s “driving motivations in his own words.” The items, three-quarters of which were already public, may be accessed by clicking through maxims made famous by Mr. Jobs, including “make something wonderful and put it on the market” and “pursue different paths.”
The following steps for the archive are shrouded within the type of mystery related to the way in which Mr. Jobs ran Apple. About all that’s been publicly disclosed is that Ms. Powell Jobs hired a documentary filmmaker to collect lots of of oral histories about Mr. Jobs from former colleagues. Where that material might be stored and who could have access to it has not been revealed.
In an interview, Leslie Berlin, the archive’s director, declined to say whether the gathering could be open to researchers or include any contentious material about Mr. Jobs. The writer Walter Isaacson, who did about 40 interviews with Mr. Jobs before writing a best-selling book about him, said in an email that he didn’t know much in regards to the archive and declined to comment further.
Ms. Powell Jobs has been the driving force behind the project. She married Mr. Jobs in 1991, two years after meeting him as a graduate student at Stanford. Since his death, she has used her estimated $16 billion fortune to fund the Emerson Collective, a philanthropic and business operation that owns The Atlantic magazine and funds a company trying to cut back gun violence in Chicago.
During his life, Mr. Jobs admired and encouraged historians to preserve the history of his Silicon Valley predecessors comparable to Robert Noyce, who co-founded the chip maker Intel. But he put little value on his own history, and Apple has seldom commemorated product anniversaries, saying it focuses on the long run, not the past.
When Mr. Jobs returned to Apple in 1997, a dozen years after he was forced out, considered one of the primary things he did was offer Stanford University the corporate’s corporate archives, said Henry Lowood, the curator of Stanford libraries’ History of Science & Technology Collections. Stanford had a signed document from Apple’s legal department inside 24 hours, allowing it to move some 800 boxes from the corporate’s campus to the university.
Stanford spent years cataloging items comparable to photos of a barefoot Mr. Jobs at work, promoting campaigns and an Apple II computer. That material may be reviewed by students and researchers focused on learning more in regards to the company.
Silicon Valley leaders have a convention of leaving their material with Stanford, which has collections of letters, slides and notes from William Hewlett, who founded Hewlett-Packard, and Andy Grove, the previous chief executive of Intel.
Mr. Lowood said that he uses the Silicon Valley archives to show students in regards to the value of discovery. “Unlike a book, which is the gospel and all true, a mixture of materials in a box introduces uncertainty,” he said.
After Mr. Jobs’s death in 2011, Mr. Isaacson, the writer, published a biography of Mr. Jobs. Some at Apple complained that the book, a best seller, misrepresented Mr. Jobs and commercialized his death.
Mr. Isaacson declined to comment about those complaints.
4 years later, the book became the idea for a movie. The 2015 movie, written by Aaron Sorkin and starring Michael Fassbender, focused on Mr. Jobs being ousted from Apple and denying paternity of his eldest daughter.
Ms. Powell Jobs lobbied to stop the film, in line with emails made public after a hack of Sony Pictures, which held rights to the film. She and others who were near Mr. Jobs thought any movie based on the book could be inaccurate.
“I used to be outraged, and he was my friend,” said Mike Slade, a marketing executive who worked as an adviser to Mr. Jobs from 1998 to 2004. “I can’t imagine how outraged Laurene was.”
In November 2015, a month after the movie’s release, Ms. Powell Jobs had representatives register the Steve Jobs Archive as a limited liability company in Delaware and California. She later hired the documentary filmmaker, Davis Guggenheim, to collect oral histories about Mr. Jobs from former colleagues and friends. She also hired Ms. Berlin, who was Stanford’s project historian for its Apple archives, to be the Jobs Archive’s executive director.
Mr. Guggenheim gathered material about Mr. Jobs while also working on a Netflix documentary about Bill Gates, “Inside Bill’s Brain.” Mr. Slade, who worked for each Mr. Jobs and Mr. Gates, said he sat for an interview about one executive, stopped to vary shirts and returned to debate the opposite one.
Ms. Berlin assisted Ms. Powell Jobs in gathering material. They collected items comparable to audio of interviews done by reporters and early company records, including a 1976 document that Mr. Jobs and Steve Wozniak, Apple’s co-founder, called their declaration of independence. It outlined what the corporate would stand for, said Regis McKenna, who unearthed the document in his personal collection gathered during his many years as a pioneer of Silicon Valley marketing and adviser to Mr. Jobs.
Ms. Powell Jobs also assembled a bunch of advisers to tell what the archive could be, including Tim Cook, Apple’s chief executive; Jony Ive, Apple’s former chief design officer; and Bob Iger, the previous chief executive of Walt Disney and a former Apple board member.
Mr. Cook, Mr. Ive and Mr. Iger declined to comment.
Apple, which has its own corporate archive and archivist, is a contributor to the Jobs effort, said Ms. Berlin, who declined to say how she works with the corporate to realize access to material left by Mr. Jobs.
The archive’s resulting website opens with an email that Mr. Jobs sent himself at Apple. It reads like a journal entry, outlining all of the things that he will depend on others to offer, from the food he eats to the music he enjoys.
“I really like and admire my species, living and dead, and am totally depending on them for my life and well being,” he wrote.
The e-mail is followed by a previously undisclosed audio clip from a 1984 interview that Mr. Jobs did with Michael Moritz, the journalist turned enterprise capitalist at Sequoia. During it, Mr. Jobs says that refinement comes from mistakes, a platitude that captures how Apple used trial and error to develop devices.
“It was just lying within the drawer gathering dust,” Mr. Moritz said of the recording.
It’s clear to those that have contributed material that the archive is about safeguarding Mr. Jobs’s legacy. It’s a goal that lots of them support.
“There’s a lot distortion about who Steve was,” Mr. McKenna said. “There needed to be something more factual.”