WASHINGTON — Washington and Wall Street are bracing for a revival of brinkmanship over the nation’s statutory debt limit, raising fears that the delicate U.S. economy may very well be rattled by a calamitous self-inflicted wound.
For years, Republicans have sought to tie spending cuts or other concessions from Democrats to their votes to lift the borrowing cap, even when it means eroding the world’s faith that america will at all times pay its bills. Now, back in command of a chamber of Congress, Republicans are poised once more to leverage the debt limit to make fiscal demands of President Biden.
Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen warned on Friday that she would need to undertake “extraordinary measures” to proceed paying the nation’s bills beyond January if lawmakers didn’t act to boost the debt limit — and that her powers to delay a default may very well be exhausted by early June.
The fight over the debt limit is renewing debates about what the actual consequences could be if america were unable to borrow money to pay its bills, including what it owes to the bondholders who own U.S. Treasury debt and essentially provide a line of credit to the federal government.
Some Republicans argue that the ramifications of breaching the debt limit and defaulting are overblown. Democrats and the White House — together with a wide range of economists and forecasters — warn of dire scenarios that include a shutdown of basic government functions, a hobbled public health system, and a deep and painful financial crisis.
Speaker Kevin McCarthy signaled that he and his fellow Republicans would seek to make use of the debt limit standoff to enact spending cuts and reduce the national debt. He said that lawmakers very likely had until summertime to search out an answer before america runs out of money, a threshold that’s referred to as “X-date.”
“One in all the best threats now we have to this nation is our debt,” Mr. McCarthy said on Fox News, adding, “We don’t want to simply have this runaway spending.”
Mr. Biden has repeatedly said that he’ll refuse to barter over the debt limit, and that Congress must vote to boost it with no strings attached.
That has introduced the very real likelihood of a debt limit breach. “Fiscal deadlines will pose a greater risk this 12 months than they’ve for a decade,” economists at Goldman Sachs wrote in a note.
Understand the U.S. Debt Ceiling
Card 1 of 4
What’s the debt ceiling? The debt ceiling, also called the debt limit, is a cap on the overall sum of money that the federal government is permitted to borrow via U.S. Treasury securities, comparable to bills and savings bonds, to meet its financial obligations. Because america runs budget deficits, it must borrow huge sums of cash to pay its bills.
Why is there a limit on U.S. borrowing? In keeping with the Structure, Congress must authorize borrowing. The debt limit was instituted within the early twentieth century in order that the Treasury wouldn’t have to ask for permission every time it needed to issue debt to pay bills.
What would occur if the debt limit was hit? Breaching the debt limit would result in a first-ever default for america, creating financial chaos in the worldwide economy. It might also force American officials to make a choice from continuing assistance like Social Security checks and paying interest on the country’s debt.
Here’s a take a look at what the debt limit is and why it matters.
What’s the debt limit?
The debt limit is a cap on the overall sum of money that the federal government is permitted to borrow to meet its financial obligations. Because america runs budget deficits — meaning it spends greater than it brings in through taxes and other revenue — it must borrow huge sums of cash to pay its bills. That features funding for social safety net programs, interest on the national debt and salaries for troops.
After a protracted standoff in late 2021, Congress agreed to boost the borrowing cap to $31 trillion.
Although the debt ceiling debate often elicits calls by lawmakers to reduce on government spending, lifting the debt limit doesn’t authorize any latest spending and the truth is simply allows america to finance existing obligations. In other words, it allows the federal government to pay the bills it has already incurred.
When will we hit the borrowing cap?
Ms. Yellen’s declaration that a default could loom as early as June signaled that there was less time to resolve the matter than some had estimated even recently.
Analysts at Goldman Sachs had put the date around August. The Bipartisan Policy Center, which closely tracks the debt limit deadline, projected last summer that the X-date would likely arrive no before the third quarter of 2023.
The actual moment when the federal government can not fully meet its obligations on time, if it arrives, will likely be a function of the Treasury Department’s money flow, which could change depending on the trajectory of the economy and the fate of certain policies.
What happens if we actually go over that cliff?
Just approaching a breach of the debt limit can hurt the economy. In 2011, congressional Republicans and President Barack Obama engaged in a standoff over spending and debt that was resolved just in time to avoid hitting the limit. That brinkmanship rattled investors, consumers and business owners, with concrete consequences.
Stock prices plunged — and volatility available in the market spiked — as lawmakers approached a debt limit breach. They didn’t get well for half a 12 months. The fee of borrowing for firms, which fluctuates with the extent of risk that investors perceive within the economy, jumped substantially. That made it costlier for firms to borrow to make latest investments. Mortgage rates spiked similarly, hampering prospective home buyers. The credit agency S&P downgraded America’s credit standing for the primary time.
Consumer confidence and small-business optimism each plunged through the crisis, as well.
An actual breach could be far worse, economists warn.
If the Treasury Department is unable to make payments to lenders who hold federal debt — what’s referred to as a default — investors would demand much higher rates of interest in the long run to loan money to the federal government. It might be just like what happens when borrowers miss bank card payments — their credit rankings go down, and the rate of interest they pay often goes up.
Such a scenario would add drastically to the federal government’s interest payments, which the White House projects will cost the equivalent of two.6 percent of the overall American economy over the subsequent decade, further squeezing the federal budget. It might also threaten to destabilize bond markets globally because U.S. Treasury bonds are largely seen as one among the safest investments on this planet.
That spiral would most certainly occur even when the federal government maintains its payments to bondholders but is unable to pay other bills, like salaries for federal staff.
Perhaps most immediately damaging to an already fragile U.S. recovery, the federal government would pull an enormous amount of spending power out of the economy overnight if it breached the borrowing limit. By selecting to not pay some combination of Social Security checks, federal staff, bondholders and more, the federal government could be immediately killing the equivalent of one-tenth of American economic activity, Goldman Sachs analysts have estimated.
“It’s a great amount,” said Alec Phillips, Goldman’s chief political economist. “You simply take 10 percent of the economy out of play for a bit until you resolve it.”
Researchers at Third Way, a Democratic think tank, estimated in December that a debt limit breach could kill up to a few million jobs, add $130,000 to the associated fee of a mean 30-year mortgage and balloon the national debt by an extra $850 billion.
What are the choices to avoid catastrophe?
As a primary step, to ward off default, Ms. Yellen said she would begin suspending latest investments within the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund and the Postal Service Retiree Health Advantages Fund, and suspending reinvestment within the Government Securities Investment Fund of the Federal Employees Retirement System’s Thrift Savings Plan to avoid breaching the debt limit.
Prior to now, Treasury officials have discussed attempting to prioritize certain payments — like military salaries — or delaying payments entirely for a certain period until the federal government has sufficient revenue to cover all of its bills. Either scenario would cause chaos within the financial markets and set off legal challenges.
In late 2021, a couple of dozen officials within the department’s Office of Fiscal Projections were tracking the scale and timing of the nation’s inflows and outflows of cash to refine its estimates for the so-called X-date. They kept close tabs on fluctuations in nonmarketable debt, comparable to savings bonds, and coordinated closely with government agencies to find out their spending needs.
Treasury officials also prepared for once they might need to conserve money and suspend the each day reinvestment of Treasury securities held by the Exchange Stabilization Fund, a pot of emergency money that’s alleged to be used to intervene in currency markets during times of turmoil. That’s the last step before the agency’s fiscal accounting maneuvers, referred to as extraordinary measures, would likely be exhausted.
What role does the Federal Reserve play?
Containing that fallout from a default would initially be the responsibility of the Federal Reserve.
The central bank has a playbook for coping with a debt ceiling breach that was laid out during conference calls and meetings in 2011 and 2013.
Within the 2011 congressional standoff, central bankers held a call to debate what the Fed could do to rescue the economic system.
The choices included treating defaulted Treasury bonds similar to bonds which have not defaulted when it got here to Fed operations that purchased government debt or accepted it as collateral, “as long as the default reflects a political impasse and never any underlying inability of america to satisfy its obligations,” in accordance with the transcripts of that decision. The Fed also suggested that it could support money market mutual funds, as shorter-term debt markets faced widespread disruptions.
Most notably, the Fed’s staff suggested that the central bank could specifically purchase defaulted Treasury bonds, essentially paying off bondholders in a bid to maintain markets functioning.
And it discussed buying defaulted bonds while selling off unaffected ones — though transcripts show that officials anxious that “such an approach could insert the Federal Reserve right into a very strained political situation and will raise questions on its independence from debt management issues faced by the Treasury.”
Jerome H. Powell, who’s now the Fed’s chair, once called the potential of purposely buying defaulted Treasury debt “loathsome.”
When the debt ceiling again emerged as an issue in 2013, Mr. Powell, who was then a Fed governor, anxious that the central bank might make default more likely by promoting that it had a solid plan for coping with one.
“If it actually looks like a very good game plan, then it’s going to make it less likely that the Congress will feel enough pressure to really raise the ceiling,” he warned in a strategy call that October.
But he added, “I don’t need to say today what I might and wouldn’t do, if now we have to really cope with a catastrophe on this.”
Could such crises be averted in the long run?
Ms. Yellen has dismissed the viability of theoretical ideas to boost the debt limit, comparable to minting a trillion-dollar coin. But she has called for abolishing the statutory debt limit entirely, warning that the borrowing cap was “destructive” to the U.S. economy and arguing that it was blocking the federal government from spending money that Congress had already authorized.
Up to now, that suggestion has gone unheeded by Congress. Disposing of the debt limit, it seems, is even harder than raising it.